PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCC vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCC vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QARP

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.39%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.57%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBCC
QARP

Technology

38.7%
21.9%

Healthcare

14.4%
11.3%

Financial Services

12.1%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
13.2%

Real Estate

7.9%
0.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
10.5%

Industrials

3.4%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Energy

-

6.5%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Technology

MBCC
38.7%
QARP
21.9%

Healthcare

MBCC
14.4%
QARP
11.3%

Financial Services

MBCC
12.1%
QARP
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MBCC
11.5%
QARP
13.2%

Real Estate

MBCC
7.9%
QARP
0.6%

Communication Services

MBCC
7.8%
QARP
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

MBCC
4.2%
QARP
10.5%

Industrials

MBCC
3.4%
QARP
9.0%

Basic Materials

MBCC

-

QARP
2.1%

Energy

MBCC

-

QARP
6.5%

Utilities

MBCC

-

QARP
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCC vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCC

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCC vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCC vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCCQARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

Drawdowns

MBCC vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCCQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

MBCC vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCCQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

MBCC vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCC vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MBCC
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.03%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.19% for QARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCC and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer