MBCC vs. GSG
MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MBCC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
MBCC vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCC vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
MBCC
GSG
MBCC vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.09 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCC vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -89.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -56.95% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -63.71% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility
MBCC vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.95% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.61% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.03% | — |
MBCC vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCC vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBCC nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.
MBCC and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MBCC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSG is Commodities. MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.75% for GSG.
Find the right allocation for MBCC and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer