PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCC vs. FLRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCC vs. FLRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLRG

1D
-0.37%
1M
4.02%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.95%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. FLRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBCC
FLRG

Technology

38.7%
34.7%

Healthcare

14.4%
9.2%

Financial Services

12.1%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
10.7%

Real Estate

7.9%
2.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.6%

Industrials

3.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Energy

-

4.8%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

MBCC
38.7%
FLRG
34.7%

Healthcare

MBCC
14.4%
FLRG
9.2%

Financial Services

MBCC
12.1%
FLRG
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MBCC
11.5%
FLRG
10.7%

Real Estate

MBCC
7.9%
FLRG
2.1%

Communication Services

MBCC
7.8%
FLRG
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

MBCC
4.2%
FLRG
4.6%

Industrials

MBCC
3.4%
FLRG
7.7%

Basic Materials

MBCC

-

FLRG
2.5%

Energy

MBCC

-

FLRG
4.8%

Utilities

MBCC

-

FLRG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCC vs. FLRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCC

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCC vs. FLRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCC vs. FLRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCCFLRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

Drawdowns

MBCC vs. FLRG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCCFLRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

MBCC vs. FLRG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCCFLRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

MBCC vs. FLRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRG's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCC vs. FLRG - Dividend Comparison

MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.34%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%
MBCC
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FLRG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.

FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.29% for FLRG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCC and FLRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer