MBCC vs. COMT
MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBCC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. MBCC is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
MBCC vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
MBCC vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MBCC
COMT
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MBCC
COMT
-
Healthcare
MBCC
COMT
-
Financial Services
MBCC
COMT
Consumer Cyclical
MBCC
COMT
-
Real Estate
MBCC
COMT
-
Communication Services
MBCC
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
MBCC
COMT
-
Industrials
MBCC
COMT
-
Basic Materials
MBCC
-
COMT
-
Energy
MBCC
-
COMT
-
Utilities
MBCC
-
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCC vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
MBCC
COMT
MBCC vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.20 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCC vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -51.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.82% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.07% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
MBCC vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCC | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.29% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.06% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.89% | — |
MBCC vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCC vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.
MBCC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for MBCC and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer