PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBA vs. MTBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBA vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBBA

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTBA

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.18%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBA vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBBA and MTBA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBA vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBA

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBA vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBBA vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBAMTBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.30

-0.90

Drawdowns

MBBA vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum MTBA drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and MTBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBAMTBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-3.48%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.60%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-0.79%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

MBBA vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBAMTBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

3.10%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

3.95%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

3.95%

+0.71%

MBBA vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBBA vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than MTBA's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MBBA
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF
1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.09%5.98%6.03%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBBA and MTBA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBA.

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 1.84% for MBBA.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.15% for MTBA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBA and MTBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer