MBBA vs. ISCMF
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. MBBA is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.27% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and ISCMF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBBA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -25.42% | +22.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -5.26% | +4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -13.34% | +12.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 17.84% | -13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 14.28% | -9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 14.28% | -9.73% |
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MBBA vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBA.
MBBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while ISCMF is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer