PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBA vs. MBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBA vs. MBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBBA

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.34%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MBB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.10%
1Y
6.17%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBA vs. MBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBBA and MBB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBA vs. MBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBA

MBB
MBB Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBA vs. MBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBBA vs. MBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBAMBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.59

-0.25

Drawdowns

MBBA vs. MBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum MBB drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and MBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBAMBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-17.64%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.42%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-2.35%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

Volatility

MBBA vs. MBB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBAMBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

4.51%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.64%

6.81%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

5.31%

-0.67%

MBBA vs. MBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MBB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBBA vs. MBB - Dividend Comparison

MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than MBB's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBB
iShares MBS Bond ETF
4.27%4.21%3.94%3.40%2.31%1.05%2.10%2.77%2.64%2.23%2.58%2.66%
MBBA
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF
1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBBA and MBB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MBB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MBB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBA.

MBB has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 1.84% for MBBA.

Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.06% for MBB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBA and MBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer