MBB vs. EEM
MBB (iShares MBS Bond ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBB is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MBB returned 1.33%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for EEM. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. MBB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
MBB vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBB achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 23.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MBB has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 1.33%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.
MBB
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
EEM
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 23.38%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 44.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
MBB vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBB iShares MBS Bond ETF | 1.01% | 8.38% | 1.31% | 5.01% | -11.74% | -1.43% | 4.08% | 6.18% | 0.82% | 2.49% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 23.38% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBB and EEM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2007 | -0.05 |
The correlation between MBB and EEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBB vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
MBB
EEM
MBB vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBB | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.32 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 12.25 | -5.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBB vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBB drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBB and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBB | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.64% | -66.43% | +48.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -13.52% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.68% | -17.29% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -37.49% | +20.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.64% | -39.82% | +22.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -4.66% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -16.01% | +13.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 3.66% | -2.74% |
Volatility
MBB vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) is 1.57%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 10.98%. This indicates that MBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBB | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 10.98% | -9.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 19.41% | -16.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.47% | 21.64% | -17.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.82% | 19.27% | -12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 20.65% | -15.34% |
MBB vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBB vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
MBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than EEM's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.80% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
MBB iShares MBS Bond ETF | 4.26% | 4.21% | 3.94% | 3.40% | 2.31% | 1.05% | 2.10% | 2.77% | 2.64% | 2.23% | 2.58% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBB and EEM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to MBB (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBB dropped -17.64% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 9.81% vs 1.33% for MBB. On fees, MBB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, MBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MBB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
MBB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.80% for EEM.
MBB is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. MBB tracks Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.06% for MBB and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBB and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer