MBB vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
MBB and AGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MBB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index. It was launched on Mar 16, 2007. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003. Both MBB and AGG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MBB or AGG.
Performance
MBB vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBB achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than AGG's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MBB has underperformed AGG with an annualized return of 0.86%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively higher 1.44% annualized return.
MBB
1.68%
-0.29%
3.73%
6.63%
-0.63%
0.86%
AGG
1.93%
-0.49%
3.50%
6.44%
-0.23%
1.44%
Key characteristics
MBB | AGG | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.01 | 1.12 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.48 | 1.63 |
Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.48 | 0.45 |
Martin Ratio | 3.17 | 3.61 |
Ulcer Index | 2.09% | 1.78% |
Daily Std Dev | 6.57% | 5.76% |
Max Drawdown | -17.65% | -18.43% |
Current Drawdown | -7.36% | -8.38% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MBB vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between MBB and AGG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MBB vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MBB vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
MBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than AGG's 3.95% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MBS Bond ETF | 3.85% | 3.40% | 2.31% | 1.05% | 2.10% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.23% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 1.72% | 1.27% |
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.95% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.40% | 2.32% |
Drawdowns
MBB vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBB drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBB and AGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MBB vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.49%. This indicates that MBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.