MBAIX vs. RPFCX
MBAIX (MainStay Balanced Fund) and RPFCX (Davis Appreciation & Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MBAIX returned 7.49%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for RPFCX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MBAIX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for RPFCX.
Performance
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBAIX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MBAIX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 7.49%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.
MBAIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.37%
RPFCX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBAIX MainStay Balanced Fund | 7.70% | 11.38% | 7.59% | 7.56% | -5.80% | 17.13% | 7.73% | 19.28% | -7.53% | 9.87% |
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund | 14.17% | 20.90% | 9.10% | 23.00% | -15.65% | 25.74% | 4.74% | 20.33% | -8.02% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBAIX and RPFCX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1993 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MBAIX and RPFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBAIX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank
MBAIX
RPFCX
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBAIX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.54 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.99 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 15.92 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBAIX drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum RPFCX drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBAIX and RPFCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBAIX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.74% | -56.39% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -6.76% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.37% | -14.82% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.19% | -25.63% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.87% | -30.72% | +4.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.39% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -7.40% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.70% | -0.54% |
Volatility
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) have volatilities of 1.92% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBAIX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 2.02% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 6.74% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.04% | 9.05% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.39% | 14.04% | -4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 14.75% | -4.18% |
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBAIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBAIX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison
MBAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than RPFCX's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBAIX MainStay Balanced Fund | 6.55% | 6.95% | 6.14% | 2.27% | 1.86% | 23.51% | 2.24% | 6.04% | 9.37% | 7.05% | 2.94% | 6.93% |
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund | 5.67% | 6.09% | 1.11% | 2.91% | 2.63% | 0.28% | 0.78% | 2.03% | 1.09% | 0.83% | 1.09% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBAIX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPFCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to MBAIX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBAIX dropped -39.74% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.
RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBAIX and RPFCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer