MAYZ vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAYZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAYZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MAYZ returned 9.06%/yr vs 20.07%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAYZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYZ achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

MAYZ

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF	6.56%	13.70%	17.68%	15.90%	-13.98%	10.08%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYZ and ENFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2021	0.40

The correlation between MAYZ and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAYZ	ENFR
Technology	35.3%	-
Financial Services	13.4%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	-
Communication Services	9.9%	-
Healthcare	8.8%	-
Industrials	7.8%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	-
Energy	3.0%	98.5%
Utilities	2.5%	1.4%
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

MAYZ vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYZ

MAYZ Risk / Return Rank: 54
MAYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MAYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MAYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MAYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MAYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAYZ	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.88	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.59	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	3.23	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	8.24	+1.18

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYZ and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYZ drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYZ and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAYZ	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-68.28%	+49.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-8.64%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.88%	-15.58%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	-20.29%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.29%	-4.71%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-15.94%	+11.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	3.38%	-1.41%

Volatility

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) is 3.58%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that MAYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAYZ	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	5.69%	-2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.78%	11.60%	-2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	14.86%	-4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.14%	19.25%	-7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.06%	24.68%	-12.62%

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAYZ vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

MAYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF	2.02%	2.15%	1.95%	2.75%	0.69%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAYZ and ENFR in my portfolio?

MAYZ and ENFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAYZ or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to MAYZ (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYZ dropped -19.23% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, MAYZ or ENFR?

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 20.07% vs 9.06% for MAYZ. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MAYZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAYZ or ENFR?

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAYZ or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MAYZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAYZ or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.02% for MAYZ.

What is the main difference between MAYZ and ENFR?

MAYZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. MAYZ tracks S&P 500 Price Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MAYZ and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.