PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYU vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYU vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYU achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's 8.24% return.


MAYU

1D
1.56%
1M
2.85%
6M
10.10%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.97%

ARLU

1D
1.77%
1M
3.12%
6M
7.33%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$99.89K$131.60K$99.19K
$190.95K$168.06K$454.97K

MAYU vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAYU and ARLU is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024

0.99

The correlation between MAYU and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYU vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAYU
MAYU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MAYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAYU vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAYUARLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.65

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

6.90

+1.84

MAYU vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYU Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYU and ARLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAYU vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYU drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, roughly equal to the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYU and ARLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYUARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-15.38%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-9.66%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-2.21%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.31%

-0.14%

Volatility

MAYU vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) is 3.37%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that MAYU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYUARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.74%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

9.53%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

11.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

12.61%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

12.61%

+0.33%

MAYU vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAYU and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

MAYU vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYU nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, MAYU and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARLU has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to MAYU (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYU dropped -15.37% vs ARLU's -15.38%.

On 1-year performance, MAYU leads with 18.93% vs 15.92% for ARLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, MAYU has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAYU has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 15.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAYU and ARLU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

MAYU and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MAYU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ARLU is Options Trading.

MAYU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYU and ARLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer