MAYU vs. UXJL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MAYU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAYU returned 18.93% vs 24.06% for UXJL. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MAYU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.

Performance

MAYU vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYU achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 14.10% return.

MAYU

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 2.85%
• 6M: 10.10%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.97%

UXJL

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 3.69%
• 6M: 12.99%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 1Y: 24.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	$190.95K	$168.06K	$454.97K
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	$17.51K	$18.88K	$22.37K

MAYU vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	11.03%	7.54%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	14.10%	8.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYU and UXJL is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2025	0.99

The correlation between MAYU and UXJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAYU vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAYU

MAYU Risk / Return Rank: 58
MAYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MAYU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MAYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MAYU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

UXJL

UXJL Risk / Return Rank: 61
UXJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
UXJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
UXJL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
UXJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
UXJL Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAYU vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAYU	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.65	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.30	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.35	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	9.43	-0.69

MAYU vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYU Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the UXJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYU and UXJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAYU vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYU drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYU and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAYU	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.37%	-10.29%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-10.29%	+1.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-1.66%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.56%	-0.39%

Volatility

MAYU vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) is 3.37%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that MAYU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAYU	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	4.54%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	11.81%	-2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	14.72%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.94%	14.60%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.94%	14.60%	-1.66%

MAYU vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAYU vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYU nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAYU and UXJL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, MAYU and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MAYU or UXJL?

UXJL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to MAYU (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYU dropped -15.37% vs UXJL's -10.29%.

Which ETF is better, MAYU or UXJL?

On 1-year performance, UXJL leads with 24.06% vs 18.93% for MAYU. On fees, MAYU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, MAYU has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAYU or UXJL?

Over the 1-year period, UXJL has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 18.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAYU or UXJL?

MAYU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAYU or UXJL?

MAYU and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MAYU and UXJL?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MAYU and 0.85% for UXJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UXJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.