PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATH vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MATH vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATH achieves a -50.95% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's 15.54% return.


MATH

1D
-2.83%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-50.95%
6M
-64.24%
1Y
-70.82%
3Y*
0.66%
5Y*
-4.98%
10Y*

^IXIC

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.13%
YTD
15.54%
6M
14.50%
1Y
38.43%
3Y*
26.58%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATH vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited
-50.95%82.61%-47.25%323.71%-57.48%-48.29%80.00%-0.01%-70.18%-68.11%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
15.54%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MATH and ^IXIC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MATH vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATH
MATH Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATH Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATH vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MATH^IXICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.41

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

2.92

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

11.39

-12.87

MATH vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MATH Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATH and ^IXIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MATH^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

2.38

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.64

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.53

-0.77

Drawdowns

MATH vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATH drawdown since its inception was -96.71%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATH and ^IXIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATH^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.71%

-77.93%

-18.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.88%

-13.21%

-65.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.88%

-24.32%

-54.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.88%

-36.40%

-42.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.47%

-0.89%

-91.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.05%

-21.40%

-65.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.88%

3.38%

+44.50%

Volatility

MATH vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) has a higher volatility of 23.81% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 4.28%. This indicates that MATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATH^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.81%

4.28%

+19.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.92%

12.13%

+47.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.33%

16.25%

+72.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.91%

22.43%

+67.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.86%

22.01%

+86.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MATH and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MATH has higher volatility (23.81%) compared to ^IXIC (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATH dropped -96.71% vs ^IXIC's -77.93%.

^IXIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MATH and ^IXIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer