MATFX vs. MSMLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX).
MATFX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Dec 26, 1999. MSMLX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Sep 14, 2008.
Performance
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund | 6.71% | 30.22% | 16.47% | -1.77% | -24.66% | -5.90% | 86.75% | 29.60% | -18.59% | 52.78% |
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | -0.43% | 13.50% | -6.10% | 20.04% | -16.78% | 26.40% | 43.69% | 17.38% | -17.80% | 30.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATFX achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than MSMLX's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MATFX has outperformed MSMLX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while MSMLX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.
MATFX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 36.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
MSMLX
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATFX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MSMLX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MATFX vs. MSMLX — Risk / Return Rank
MATFX
MSMLX
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MATFX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 0.83 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 1.20 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.16 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 0.87 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 2.85 | +3.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MATFX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.83 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.35 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.58 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between MATFX and MSMLX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Dividend Comparison
MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.54% | 31.07% | 1.67% | 0.29% | 2.63% | 8.44% | 0.00% | 15.24% |
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 1.50% | 1.50% | 3.95% | 8.36% | 8.04% | 9.18% | 0.28% | 0.51% | 21.31% | 8.12% | 0.43% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATFX drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, which is greater than MSMLX's maximum drawdown of -36.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATFX and MSMLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATFX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.88% | -36.40% | -40.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -12.89% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -28.00% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.42% | -34.33% | -18.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.64% | -12.89% | +2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.35% | -9.30% | -19.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 3.93% | +0.82% |
Volatility
MATFX vs. MSMLX - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) at 8.16%. This indicates that MATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSMLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MATFX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 8.16% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 12.87% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.52% | 17.61% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 17.24% | +6.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 16.83% | +5.39% |