PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATFX vs. DFJSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATFX achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly higher than DFJSX's 16.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MATFX has outperformed DFJSX with an annualized return of 13.68%, while DFJSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.64% annualized return.


MATFX

1D
2.55%
1M
-12.90%
6M
24.99%
YTD
36.26%
1Y
53.68%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
13.68%
ALL TIME*
6.75%

DFJSX

1D
3.85%
1M
1.29%
6M
9.56%
YTD
16.18%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
8.64%
ALL TIME*
6.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
36.26%30.22%16.47%-1.77%-24.66%-5.90%86.75%29.60%-18.59%52.78%
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
16.18%31.65%4.35%17.08%-11.36%-0.39%3.78%18.23%-19.56%35.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MATFX and DFJSX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1999

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MATFX vs. DFJSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MATFX
MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DFJSX
DFJSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MATFXDFJSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.43

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

7.29

+1.13

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MATFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the DFJSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATFX and DFJSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATFX drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, roughly equal to the maximum DFJSX drawdown of -76.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATFX and DFJSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATFXDFJSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.88%

-76.17%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.61%

-12.53%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-13.31%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.71%

-31.39%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.42%

-40.32%

-12.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.64%

-1.17%

-19.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.06%

-29.98%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

4.15%

+2.02%

Volatility

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) at 6.44%. This indicates that MATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFJSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATFXDFJSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

6.44%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.17%

14.01%

+13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.75%

17.36%

+12.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

16.41%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

16.64%

+6.75%

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATFX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DFJSX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MATFX vs. DFJSX - Dividend Comparison

MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
3.00%3.49%3.16%6.45%5.44%5.26%2.14%3.98%7.50%2.41%1.97%1.38%
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.54%31.07%1.67%0.29%2.63%8.44%0.00%15.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


MATFX and DFJSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MATFX has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to DFJSX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATFX dropped -76.88% vs DFJSX's -76.17%.

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MATFX and DFJSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer