PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJSX vs. FIQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFJSX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than FIQLX's 29.63% return.


DFJSX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.00%
YTD
15.33%
6M
16.82%
1Y
35.04%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
9.07%

FIQLX

1D
1.79%
1M
5.27%
YTD
29.63%
6M
30.03%
1Y
51.94%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
15.33%31.65%4.35%17.08%-11.36%-0.39%3.78%18.23%-12.76%
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
29.63%31.84%7.43%16.09%-22.16%3.32%25.58%25.93%-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJSX and FIQLX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.84

The correlation between DFJSX and FIQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJSX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJSX
DFJSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DFJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQLX
FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFJSXFIQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.87

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

14.40

-5.90

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJSX and FIQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJSX drawdown since its inception was -76.17%, which is greater than FIQLX's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJSX and FIQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJSXFIQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.17%

-36.13%

-40.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-12.73%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-19.14%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-36.13%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

0.00%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.06%

-10.24%

-19.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

3.42%

+0.58%

Volatility

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) is 4.32%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that DFJSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJSXFIQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

7.95%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

17.51%

-4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

22.11%

-5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

20.18%

-3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

19.95%

-3.36%

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJSX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

DFJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than FIQLX's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
3.03%3.49%3.16%6.45%5.44%5.26%2.14%3.98%7.50%2.41%1.97%1.38%
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
7.75%10.04%5.04%3.88%0.00%11.89%1.97%1.35%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJSX and FIQLX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQLX has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to DFJSX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJSX dropped -76.17% vs FIQLX's -36.13%.

FIQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJSX and FIQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer