MATE vs. GMMA
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. MATE is actively managed, while GMMA is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GMMA.
Performance
MATE vs. GMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than GMMA's 3.61% return.
MATE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMMA
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. GMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 20.78% | 4.27% |
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 3.61% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and GMMA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. GMMA — Risk / Return Rank
MATE
GMMA
MATE vs. GMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MATE | GMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.07 | 1.09 | +1.98 |
Drawdowns
MATE vs. GMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than GMMA's maximum drawdown of -5.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and GMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | GMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -5.21% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.41% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -1.23% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility
MATE vs. GMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | GMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 5.32% | +16.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 7.10% | +14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 7.10% | +14.66% |
MATE vs. GMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. GMMA - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 3.65% | 3.00% | 0.57% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and GMMA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMMA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMMA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and GammaRoad Capital Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.75% for GMMA.
Find the right allocation for MATE and GMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer