MATE vs. ARP
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and ARP (Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for ARP.
Performance
MATE vs. ARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than ARP's 11.60% return.
MATE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARP
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 20.78% | 4.27% |
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 11.60% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and ARP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank
MATE
ARP
MATE vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MATE | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.07 | 1.36 | +1.71 |
Drawdowns
MATE vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and ARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -10.13% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.29% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -1.81% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility
MATE vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 13.53% | +8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 10.06% | +11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 10.06% | +11.70% |
MATE vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 5.86% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 2.67% | 0.06% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and ARP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MATE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MATE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.
ARP has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and PMV. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 1.42% for ARP.
Find the right allocation for MATE and ARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer