PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATE vs. ARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MATE vs. ARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than ARP's 11.60% return.


MATE

1D
-0.07%
1M
7.70%
YTD
20.78%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARP

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.94%
YTD
11.60%
6M
12.32%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATE vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MATE
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
20.78%4.27%
ARP
Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
11.60%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MATE and ARP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MATE vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATE

ARP
ARP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATE vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MATE vs. ARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MATEARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.07

1.36

+1.71

Drawdowns

MATE vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and ARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATEARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-10.13%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.29%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-1.81%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

Volatility

MATE vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATEARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

13.53%

+8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

10.06%

+11.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

10.06%

+11.70%

MATE vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MATE vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison

MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ARP
Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
5.86%6.54%5.29%2.67%0.06%
MATE
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MATE and ARP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MATE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MATE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.

ARP has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.

They also come from different issuers: Man Group and PMV. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 1.42% for ARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MATE and ARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer