PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASGX vs. PRASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASGX vs. PRASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 54.22% return, which is significantly higher than PRASX's 32.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has outperformed PRASX with an annualized return of 13.74%, while PRASX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.


MASGX

1D
2.35%
1M
11.37%
YTD
54.22%
6M
55.12%
1Y
76.70%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
13.74%

PRASX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.54%
YTD
32.48%
6M
34.20%
1Y
57.12%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASGX vs. PRASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
54.22%22.83%-2.51%7.99%-14.37%5.33%42.90%12.56%-9.70%33.75%
PRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund
32.48%26.60%6.97%0.83%-22.60%-4.33%29.56%26.75%-15.13%40.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MASGX and PRASX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.84

The correlation between MASGX and PRASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASGX vs. PRASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASGX
MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PRASX
PRASX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASGX vs. PRASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MASGXPRASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.50

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

3.96

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.01

14.70

+5.31

MASGX vs. PRASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the PRASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASGX and PRASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MASGX vs. PRASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum PRASX drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and PRASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASGXPRASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.34%

-70.53%

+34.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-14.39%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.94%

-18.34%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.34%

-41.56%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-45.07%

+8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-18.50%

+7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

3.87%

+0.09%

Volatility

MASGX vs. PRASX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) have volatilities of 12.46% and 11.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASGXPRASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.46%

11.93%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.07%

19.50%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.62%

21.91%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

19.61%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

18.59%

+0.44%

MASGX vs. PRASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than PRASX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MASGX vs. PRASX - Dividend Comparison

MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than PRASX's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
3.62%5.58%2.58%7.52%5.39%2.60%5.66%1.36%4.52%3.70%1.47%0.00%
PRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund
0.47%0.62%1.05%1.77%1.96%14.22%0.46%0.77%7.23%9.15%0.46%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASGX and PRASX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASGX has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to PRASX (11.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASGX dropped -36.34% vs PRASX's -70.53%.

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASGX and PRASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer