MAS vs. FBIN
MAS (Masco Corporation) and FBIN (Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MAS returned 10.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBIN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MAS vs. FBIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAS achieves a 17.72% return, which is significantly higher than FBIN's -12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MAS has outperformed FBIN with an annualized return of 10.99%, while FBIN has yielded a comparatively lower 0.45% annualized return.
MAS
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
FBIN
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 26.66%
- YTD
- -12.55%
- 6M
- -16.24%
- 1Y
- -12.22%
- 3Y*
- -12.21%
- 5Y*
- -11.13%
- 10Y*
- 0.45%
MAS vs. FBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAS Masco Corporation | 17.72% | -10.92% | 10.04% | 46.56% | -32.09% | 29.61% | 15.78% | 66.27% | -32.70% | 40.55% |
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | -12.55% | -25.41% | -9.12% | 35.25% | -36.48% | 26.02% | 32.92% | 74.91% | -43.66% | 29.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAS and FBIN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MAS and FBIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MAS:
$4.02
FBIN:
$2.15
MAS:
18.39
FBIN:
20.11
MAS:
2.00
FBIN:
1.17
MAS:
$7.68B
FBIN:
$3.36B
MAS:
$2.72B
FBIN:
$1.53B
MAS:
$1.39B
FBIN:
$484.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAS vs. FBIN — Risk / Return Rank
MAS
FBIN
MAS vs. FBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Masco Corporation (MAS) and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAS | FBIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.97 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | -0.31 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | -0.65 | +2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAS vs. FBIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAS drawdown since its inception was -88.75%, which is greater than FBIN's maximum drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAS and FBIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAS | FBIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.75% | -62.42% | -26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.38% | -47.93% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.95% | -61.90% | +30.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.95% | -61.90% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | -62.42% | +17.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -51.01% | +40.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.63% | -16.72% | -6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 22.80% | -10.98% |
Volatility
MAS vs. FBIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Masco Corporation (MAS) is 9.83%, while Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that MAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAS | FBIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 12.40% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.92% | 36.13% | -10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.41% | 43.30% | -10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 36.65% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 35.12% | -5.68% |
Dividends
MAS vs. FBIN - Dividend Comparison
MAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than FBIN's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | 2.36% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.68% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.01% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 1.70% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.22% | 12.68% |
Financials
MAS vs. FBIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Masco Corporation and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAS vs. FBIN - Profitability Comparison
MAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 686.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
FBIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of -66.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 316.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
FBIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported an operating income of -61.40M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.8%.
MAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
FBIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a net income of -52.20M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAS and FBIN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBIN has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to MAS (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAS dropped -88.75% vs FBIN's -62.42%.
MAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAS and FBIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer