MAS vs. RPM
MAS (Masco Corporation) and RPM (RPM International Inc.) are both stocks. MAS operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while RPM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MAS returned 11.00%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for RPM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAS vs. RPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAS achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly higher than RPM's 4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MAS has outperformed RPM with an annualized return of 11.00%, while RPM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.
MAS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
RPM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
MAS vs. RPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAS Masco Corporation | 17.00% | -10.92% | 10.04% | 46.56% | -32.09% | 29.61% | 15.78% | 66.27% | -32.70% | 40.55% |
RPM RPM International Inc. | 4.46% | -13.92% | 12.06% | 16.79% | -1.71% | 13.24% | 20.57% | 33.66% | 14.83% | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAS and RPM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, MAS and RPM have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MAS:
$14.93B
RPM:
$13.74B
MAS:
$4.02
RPM:
$5.21
MAS:
18.28
RPM:
20.64
MAS:
0.56
RPM:
2.29
MAS:
1.99
RPM:
1.78
MAS:
$7.68B
RPM:
$7.71B
MAS:
$2.72B
RPM:
$3.19B
MAS:
$1.39B
RPM:
$1.08B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAS vs. RPM — Risk / Return Rank
MAS
RPM
MAS vs. RPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Masco Corporation (MAS) and RPM International Inc. (RPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAS | RPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.10 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 0.19 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAS vs. RPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAS drawdown since its inception was -88.75%, which is greater than RPM's maximum drawdown of -61.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAS and RPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAS | RPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.75% | -61.69% | -27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.38% | -26.59% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.95% | -31.97% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.95% | -31.97% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | -38.72% | -6.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.43% | -21.11% | +9.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -10.95% | -12.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 14.16% | -2.34% |
Volatility
MAS vs. RPM - Volatility Comparison
Masco Corporation (MAS) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to RPM International Inc. (RPM) at 7.31%. This indicates that MAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAS | RPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 7.31% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.10% | 22.73% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.48% | 28.41% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.09% | 26.50% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 26.84% | +2.63% |
Dividends
MAS vs. RPM - Dividend Comparison
MAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than RPM's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAS Masco Corporation | 1.71% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.22% | 12.68% |
RPM RPM International Inc. | 1.98% | 1.99% | 1.54% | 1.54% | 1.66% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.84% | 2.23% | 2.33% | 2.09% | 2.39% |
Financials
MAS vs. RPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Masco Corporation and RPM International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAS vs. RPM - Profitability Comparison
MAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 686.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
RPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPM International Inc. reported a gross profit of 634.82M and revenue of 1.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.
MAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 316.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
RPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPM International Inc. reported an operating income of 81.09M and revenue of 1.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
MAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
RPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPM International Inc. reported a net income of 51.36M and revenue of 1.61B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAS and RPM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAS has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to RPM (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAS dropped -88.75% vs RPM's -61.69%.
MAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAS and RPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer