PortfoliosLab logo
MAS vs. RPM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MAS and RPM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MAS vs. RPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Masco Corporation (MAS) and RPM International Inc. (RPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAS:

-0.12

RPM:

0.11

Sortino Ratio

MAS:

-0.02

RPM:

0.36

Omega Ratio

MAS:

1.00

RPM:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

MAS:

-0.16

RPM:

0.10

Martin Ratio

MAS:

-0.39

RPM:

0.27

Ulcer Index

MAS:

12.39%

RPM:

11.12%

Daily Std Dev

MAS:

30.39%

RPM:

26.72%

Max Drawdown

MAS:

-90.35%

RPM:

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

MAS:

-22.52%

RPM:

-17.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAS:

$14.08B

RPM:

$14.71B

EPS

MAS:

$3.66

RPM:

$4.99

PE Ratio

MAS:

18.23

RPM:

22.95

PEG Ratio

MAS:

1.90

RPM:

2.03

PS Ratio

MAS:

1.83

RPM:

2.02

PB Ratio

MAS:

164.42

RPM:

5.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAS:

$7.70B

RPM:

$7.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAS:

$2.79B

RPM:

$3.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAS:

$1.31B

RPM:

$1.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAS achieves a -8.82% return, which is significantly lower than RPM's -6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MAS has outperformed RPM with an annualized return of 12.26%, while RPM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.


MAS

YTD

-8.82%

1M

7.02%

6M

-13.13%

1Y

-3.72%

3Y*

8.73%

5Y*

9.74%

10Y*

12.26%

RPM

YTD

-6.09%

1M

11.03%

6M

-14.38%

1Y

2.89%

3Y*

12.75%

5Y*

12.46%

10Y*

10.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Masco Corporation

RPM International Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAS vs. RPM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAS is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAS is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAS is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAS is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAS is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAS is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RPM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RPM is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RPM is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RPM is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RPM is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RPM is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RPM is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAS vs. RPM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Masco Corporation (MAS) and RPM International Inc. (RPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the RPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAS and RPM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MAS vs. RPM - Dividend Comparison

MAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than RPM's 1.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MAS
Masco Corporation
1.79%1.60%1.73%2.40%1.22%1.26%1.03%1.49%0.92%1.22%0.65%0.00%
RPM
RPM International Inc.
1.74%1.54%1.54%1.66%1.52%1.61%1.84%2.23%2.33%2.09%2.39%1.93%

Drawdowns

MAS vs. RPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAS drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than RPM's maximum drawdown of -61.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAS and RPM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MAS vs. RPM - Volatility Comparison

Masco Corporation (MAS) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to RPM International Inc. (RPM) at 6.46%. This indicates that MAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MAS vs. RPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Masco Corporation and RPM International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20212022202320242025
1.80B
1.48B
(MAS) Total Revenue
(RPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAS vs. RPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Masco Corporation and RPM International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
35.8%
38.4%
(MAS) Gross Margin
(RPM) Gross Margin
MAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.00M and revenue of 1.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

RPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RPM International Inc. reported a gross profit of 567.49M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

MAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 286.00M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

RPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RPM International Inc. reported an operating income of 65.78M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

MAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 186.00M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

RPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RPM International Inc. reported a net income of 52.03M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.