MAS vs. SHW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Masco Corporation (MAS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).

Performance

MAS vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Masco Corporation (MAS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAS vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAS Masco Corporation	-4.46%	-10.92%	10.04%	46.56%	-32.09%	29.61%	15.78%	66.27%	-32.70%	40.55%
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company	-0.86%	-3.83%	9.90%	32.73%	-31.96%	44.90%	27.05%	49.70%	-3.23%	54.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MAS : $12.50B SHW : $79.75B
EPS MAS : $3.86 SHW : $10.28
PE Ratio MAS : 15.63 SHW : 31.19
PEG Ratio MAS : 0.76 SHW : 3.22
PS Ratio MAS : 1.67 SHW : 3.40
PB Ratio MAS : 164.43 SHW : 17.34
Total Revenue (TTM) MAS : $7.56B SHW : $23.59B
Gross Profit (TTM) MAS : $2.68B SHW : $11.53B
EBITDA (TTM) MAS : $1.23B SHW : $4.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAS achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than SHW's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MAS has underperformed SHW with an annualized return of 8.16%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.

MAS

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -15.71%
• YTD: -4.46%
• 6M: -13.44%
• 1Y: -11.55%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 8.16%

SHW

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -11.40%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: -7.00%
• 1Y: -7.38%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 13.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MAS vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAS

MAS Risk / Return Rank: 26
MAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MAS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MAS Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SHW

SHW Risk / Return Rank: 29
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAS vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Masco Corporation (MAS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAS	SHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	-0.30	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	-0.27	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.97	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.26	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.87	-0.60	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAS vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAS and SHW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAS	SHW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	-0.30	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.24	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.53	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.55	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between MAS and SHW is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MAS vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

MAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SHW's 0.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAS Masco Corporation	2.07%	1.95%	1.60%	1.70%	2.40%	1.20%	0.99%	1.03%	1.49%	0.92%	1.22%	12.68%
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company	0.99%	0.98%	0.84%	0.78%	1.01%	0.62%	0.73%	0.77%	0.87%	0.83%	1.25%	1.03%

Drawdowns

MAS vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAS drawdown since its inception was -88.75%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAS and SHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAS	SHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.75%	-52.02%	-36.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.38%	-18.74%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.95%	-42.46%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	-42.46%	-2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.68%	-18.91%	-8.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-11.59%	-12.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.93%	7.98%	+3.95%

Volatility

MAS vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

Masco Corporation (MAS) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 8.03%. This indicates that MAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAS	SHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	8.03%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.74%	16.51%	+5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.98%	25.21%	+8.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.20%	25.75%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.96%	26.27%	+2.69%

Financials

MAS vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Masco Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 607.00M and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.73B and revenue of 5.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.

MAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 248.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 775.80M and revenue of 5.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

MAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 476.80M and revenue of 5.61B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.