FBIN vs. SCHL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Scholastic Corporation (SCHL).
Performance
FBIN vs. SCHL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBIN vs. SCHL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | -23.10% | -25.41% | -9.12% | 35.25% | -36.48% | 26.02% | 32.92% | 74.91% | -43.66% | 29.52% |
SCHL Scholastic Corporation | 31.59% | 43.96% | -42.00% | -2.52% | 0.48% | 62.97% | -33.43% | -3.00% | 1.86% | -14.30% |
Fundamentals
FBIN:
$2.47
SCHL:
$3.25
FBIN:
15.51
SCHL:
11.93
FBIN:
4.17
SCHL:
0.17
FBIN:
1.04
SCHL:
0.58
FBIN:
$4.46B
SCHL:
$1.29B
FBIN:
$1.52B
SCHL:
$678.60M
FBIN:
$673.30M
SCHL:
$82.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBIN achieves a -23.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHL's 31.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FBIN has underperformed SCHL with an annualized return of -0.90%, while SCHL has yielded a comparatively higher 2.25% annualized return.
FBIN
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -26.90%
- YTD
- -23.10%
- 6M
- -27.00%
- 1Y
- -35.91%
- 3Y*
- -11.93%
- 5Y*
- -13.07%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
SCHL
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 13.43%
- YTD
- 31.59%
- 6M
- 38.54%
- 1Y
- 112.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBIN vs. SCHL — Risk / Return Rank
FBIN
SCHL
FBIN vs. SCHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Scholastic Corporation (SCHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBIN | SCHL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | 2.45 | -3.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | 3.28 | -4.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.43 | -0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 6.91 | -7.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.11 | 22.49 | -24.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBIN | SCHL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | 2.45 | -3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.18 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | 0.06 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.11 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBIN and SCHL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FBIN vs. SCHL - Dividend Comparison
FBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than SCHL's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | 2.64% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.68% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.01% |
SCHL Scholastic Corporation | 2.06% | 2.70% | 3.75% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 1.50% | 2.40% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.50% | 1.26% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
FBIN vs. SCHL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBIN drawdown since its inception was -58.18%, smaller than the maximum SCHL drawdown of -83.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIN and SCHL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBIN | SCHL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.18% | -83.12% | +24.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.06% | -16.19% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.18% | -64.52% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.18% | -64.52% | +6.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.92% | -10.39% | -46.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -31.04% | +14.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.96% | 4.97% | +11.99% |
Volatility
FBIN vs. SCHL - Volatility Comparison
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) at 10.73%. This indicates that FBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBIN | SCHL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.82% | 10.73% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 23.72% | +10.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.02% | 46.09% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.87% | 41.45% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 37.13% | -2.47% |
Financials
FBIN vs. SCHL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. and Scholastic Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities