FBIN vs. SCHL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Scholastic Corporation (SCHL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FBIN or SCHL.
Key characteristics
| FBIN | SCHL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.66% | -2.34% |
| 1Y Return | 13.27% | -9.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.72% | 5.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.70% | 1.57% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.63% | 3.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.51 | -0.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.55% | 34.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.10% | -83.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.39% | -20.35% |
Fundamentals
| FBIN | SCHL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.42B | $1.01B |
| EPS | $3.26 | $1.39 |
| PE Ratio | 23.10 | 25.82 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.31 | 3.63 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.70B | $1.64B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.93B | $877.40M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $910.50M | $100.10M |
Correlation
The correlation between FBIN and SCHL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FBIN vs. SCHL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FBIN achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly lower than SCHL's -2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FBIN has outperformed SCHL with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SCHL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FBIN vs. SCHL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Scholastic Corporation (SCHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FBIN vs. SCHL - Dividend Comparison
FBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than SCHL's 2.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | 1.27% | 1.21% | 1.68% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.66% |
SCHL Scholastic Corporation | 2.20% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 1.50% | 2.40% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.50% | 1.26% | 1.56% | 1.65% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
FBIN vs. SCHL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBIN drawdown since its inception was -52.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHL drawdown of -83.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIN and SCHL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FBIN vs. SCHL - Volatility Comparison
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) at 5.07%. This indicates that FBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FBIN vs. SCHL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. and Scholastic Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities