PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARZ vs. APRZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MARZ vs. APRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MARZ vs. APRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MARZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF
-3.87%12.90%17.90%20.37%-12.70%14.04%
APRZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF
-4.60%12.97%18.46%22.23%-11.43%13.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARZ achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly higher than APRZ's -4.60% return.


MARZ

1D
2.10%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*

APRZ

1D
2.70%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-4.60%
6M
-2.90%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MARZ vs. APRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARZ and APRZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

MARZ vs. APRZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARZ
MARZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

APRZ
APRZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
APRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
APRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARZ vs. APRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARZAPRZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.81

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.89

5.37

+0.53

MARZ vs. APRZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the APRZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARZ and APRZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARZAPRZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.81

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.76

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between MARZ and APRZ is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MARZ vs. APRZ - Dividend Comparison

MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than APRZ's 3.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MARZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF
3.43%3.30%4.55%7.33%0.78%2.43%
APRZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF
3.52%3.35%2.78%2.89%0.59%0.00%

Drawdowns

MARZ vs. APRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, roughly equal to the maximum APRZ drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and APRZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MARZAPRZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-18.15%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-9.65%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-6.39%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-3.72%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.32%

-0.20%

Volatility

MARZ vs. APRZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) is 4.14%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that MARZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MARZAPRZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.85%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

8.46%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

14.85%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

12.51%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.30%

12.51%

-0.21%