MARZ vs. SEPZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MARZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF) and SEPZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Index, while SEPZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MARZ returned 10.91%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for SEPZ. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MARZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for SEPZ.

Performance

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARZ achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than SEPZ's 8.94% return.

MARZ

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 8.58%
• 1Y: 21.45%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: —

SEPZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 8.94%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 22.26%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF	8.46%	12.90%	17.90%	20.37%	-12.70%	17.08%
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF	8.94%	13.18%	18.23%	17.94%	-8.51%	18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MARZ and SEPZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2021	0.97

The correlation between MARZ and SEPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MARZ vs. SEPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARZ

MARZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
MARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
MARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SEPZ

SEPZ Risk / Return Rank: 67
SEPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SEPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SEPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SEPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SEPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARZ	SEPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.25	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.19	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.09	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	14.02	-1.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SEPZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARZ and SEPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARZ	SEPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	2.25	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.97	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.06	-0.11

Drawdowns

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than SEPZ's maximum drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and SEPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARZ	SEPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-15.22%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.45%	-7.30%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.84%	-14.57%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.89%	-15.22%	-3.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-2.84%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.61%	+0.11%

Volatility

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) is 2.31%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that MARZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARZ	SEPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	2.63%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.45%	7.25%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.69%	9.94%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.29%	12.29%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.21%	12.46%	-0.25%

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SEPZ's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

MARZ vs. SEPZ - Dividend Comparison

MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than SEPZ's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF	3.04%	3.30%	4.55%	7.33%	0.78%	2.43%
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF	2.02%	2.20%	3.62%	3.55%	0.69%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARZ and SEPZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MARZ and SEPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MARZ or SEPZ?

SEPZ has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to MARZ (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARZ dropped -18.89% vs SEPZ's -15.22%.

Which ETF is better, MARZ or SEPZ?

On 5-year performance, SEPZ leads with 11.86% vs 10.91% for MARZ. On fees, MARZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, MARZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARZ or SEPZ?

Over the 5-year period, SEPZ has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARZ or SEPZ?

MARZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARZ or SEPZ?

MARZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 2.02% for SEPZ.

What is the main difference between MARZ and SEPZ?

MARZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SEPZ is Options Trading. MARZ tracks S&P 500 Price Index, while SEPZ tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MARZ and 0.80% for SEPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.