MARS vs. TDV
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MARS is actively managed, while TDV is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
MARS vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -26.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | -2.67% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and TDV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDV
MARS vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.60% | -32.78% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.60% | -7.85% | -37.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -5.35% | -7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.55% | 19.19% | +48.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 20.84% | +46.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 23.31% | +44.24% |
MARS vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and TDV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
TDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.66% for TDV.
Find the right allocation for MARS and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer