MARS vs. STHH
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. MARS is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
MARS vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- -30.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 184.91%
- 6M
- 183.51%
- 1Y
- 147.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 12.68% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 119.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and STHH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STHH
MARS vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -33.89% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.03% | -9.01% | -28.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -10.17% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.94% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.92% | 52.69% | +15.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 51.44% | +16.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 51.44% | +16.48% |
MARS vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and STHH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.19% for STHH.
Find the right allocation for MARS and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer