PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARS vs. NVDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARS vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MARS

1D
3.41%
1M
25.54%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDW

1D
2.02%
1M
13.37%
YTD
18.30%
6M
20.44%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARS vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MARS and NVDW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARS vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARS

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARS vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MARS vs. NVDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARSNVDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.25

1.59

+5.66

Drawdowns

MARS vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and NVDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARSNVDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-25.54%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.76%

-8.85%

-7.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-8.19%

+4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.51%

Volatility

MARS vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARSNVDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.61%

41.06%

+21.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.61%

41.11%

+21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.61%

41.11%

+21.50%

MARS vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARS vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MARS and NVDW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MARS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MARS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 57.01%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.

MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while NVDW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.99% for NVDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARS and NVDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer