MARS vs. MAGY
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGY.
Performance
MARS vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 53.15% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and MAGY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
MAGY
MARS vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARS | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.25 | 1.61 | +5.64 |
Drawdowns
MARS vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and MAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -14.29% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.76% | -2.51% | -14.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -2.69% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.61% | 14.41% | +48.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 14.58% | +48.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 14.58% | +48.03% |
MARS vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 36.92% | 23.38% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and MAGY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MARS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MARS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 36.92%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while MAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.99% for MAGY.
Find the right allocation for MARS and MAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer