MARA vs. WULF
Compare and contrast key facts about Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF).
Performance
MARA vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MARA vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | -9.13% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 586.84% | -89.59% | 214.75% | 1,084.48% | -39.16% | -91.17% | -40.41% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 25.59% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | 77.08% | 86.34% | -36.55% | 12.13% | -33.16% |
Fundamentals
MARA:
-$4.32
WULF:
-$2.52
MARA:
$907.09M
WULF:
-$29.66M
MARA:
$576.49M
WULF:
-$8.27M
MARA:
-$559.37M
WULF:
-$935.92M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 25.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed WULF with an annualized return of -12.64%, while WULF has yielded a comparatively higher 3.67% annualized return.
MARA
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 6M
- -55.31%
- 1Y
- -29.04%
- 3Y*
- -2.19%
- 5Y*
- -30.09%
- 10Y*
- -12.64%
WULF
- 1D
- 5.33%
- 1M
- -11.04%
- YTD
- 25.59%
- 6M
- 26.36%
- 1Y
- 428.57%
- 3Y*
- 148.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARA vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank
MARA
WULF
MARA vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARA | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | 3.80 | -4.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | 3.80 | -3.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 13.56 | -14.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 34.60 | -35.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARA | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 3.80 | -4.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.08 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.04 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.09 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between MARA and WULF is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MARA vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARA nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
Drawdowns
MARA vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and WULF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARA | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -98.50% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | -31.74% | -38.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.87% | -98.50% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.20% | -98.50% | -0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.73% | -59.99% | -34.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -46.72% | -31.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.95% | 12.44% | +24.51% |
Volatility
MARA vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) is 25.28%, while TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a volatility of 26.80%. This indicates that MARA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MARA | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.28% | 26.80% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.57% | 69.15% | -7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.91% | 113.57% | -31.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.54% | 127.27% | -19.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.05% | 100.87% | +43.18% |
Financials
MARA vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities