MARA vs. MINT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, MARA returned -12.86%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for MINT. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

MARA vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 30.85% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of -12.86%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.74% annualized return.

MARA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.24%
• 6M: 29.83%
• YTD: 30.85%
• 1Y: -26.75%
• 3Y*: -9.46%
• 5Y*: -17.88%
• 10Y*: -12.86%
• ALL TIME*: -10.04%

MINT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 2.09%
• YTD: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: 5.21%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: 2.74%
• ALL TIME*: 2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc.	$525.82M	$574.45M	$576.54M
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	$156.87M	$162.68M	$156.96M

MARA vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc.	30.85%	-46.45%	-28.61%	586.84%	-89.59%	214.75%	1,084.48%	-39.16%	-91.17%	-40.41%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	2.51%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MARA and MINT is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2012	0.02

The correlation between MARA and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MARA vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MARA

MARA Risk / Return Rank: 30
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MARA vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MARA	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	15.96	-16.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	51.41	-51.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	14.79	-13.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	90.56	-90.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	700.39	-700.99

MARA vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARA Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 15.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARA and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MARA vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARA	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.74%	-4.62%	-95.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.53%	-0.05%	-70.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.34%	-0.16%	-78.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.87%	-2.42%	-93.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.19%	-4.62%	-94.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.41%	0.00%	-92.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-0.17%	-77.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.94%	0.01%	+44.93%

Volatility

MARA vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a higher volatility of 30.37% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that MARA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARA	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.37%	0.09%	+30.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.02%	0.22%	+63.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.39%	0.28%	+82.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	106.03%	0.58%	+105.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.48%	0.94%	+143.54%

Dividends

MARA vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.19%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARA and MINT in my portfolio?

MARA and MINT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARA or MINT?

MARA has higher volatility (30.37%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.96 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.