PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAPTX vs. MGSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPTX achieves a 34.83% return, which is significantly lower than MGSEX's 53.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MAPTX has underperformed MGSEX with an annualized return of 6.89%, while MGSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.01% annualized return.


MAPTX

1D
2.06%
1M
13.67%
YTD
34.83%
6M
38.36%
1Y
66.61%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
6.89%

MGSEX

1D
2.27%
1M
13.64%
YTD
53.02%
6M
57.41%
1Y
96.80%
3Y*
30.97%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
18.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
34.83%30.07%3.25%-4.82%-20.69%-17.92%28.88%10.75%-11.05%39.94%
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
53.02%41.56%7.23%-4.82%-27.91%0.83%38.74%80.58%-3.77%20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPTX and MGSEX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1994

0.54

Over the past year, MAPTX and MGSEX have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAPTX vs. MGSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPTX
MAPTX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MAPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MGSEX
MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAPTXMGSEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.71

4.19

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.57

4.63

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.70

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

6.84

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.03

23.15

-5.12

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is comparable to the MGSEX Sharpe Ratio of 4.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPTX and MGSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAPTXMGSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71

4.19

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.42

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.70

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.52

-0.12

Drawdowns

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPTX drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than MGSEX's maximum drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPTX and MGSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPTXMGSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-62.06%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-14.34%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.23%

-19.30%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.55%

-43.13%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.31%

-45.32%

-6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

0.00%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-13.88%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

4.24%

-0.62%

Volatility

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) is 8.97%, while AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that MAPTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAPTXMGSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

11.11%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.82%

19.66%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

24.12%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

19.88%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

25.96%

-7.76%

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MGSEX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAPTX vs. MGSEX - Dividend Comparison

MAPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than MGSEX's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
1.73%2.33%8.93%2.93%8.52%4.85%5.74%3.44%4.78%1.25%2.61%11.18%
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
0.09%0.14%0.47%0.11%0.00%83.77%4.35%59.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAPTX and MGSEX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGSEX has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to MAPTX (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPTX dropped -69.79% vs MGSEX's -62.06%.

MGSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 3.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAPTX and MGSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer