PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAPTX vs. MEGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPTX achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly lower than MEGMX's 21.66% return.


MAPTX

1D
4.12%
1M
-5.17%
6M
11.07%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
4.96%
ALL TIME*
7.54%

MEGMX

1D
4.40%
1M
-4.18%
6M
11.77%
YTD
21.66%
1Y
38.98%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
19.29%30.07%3.25%-4.82%-20.69%-17.92%50.08%
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
21.66%29.37%11.11%8.46%-20.94%-1.90%61.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPTX and MEGMX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.91

The correlation between MAPTX and MEGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAPTX vs. MEGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAPTX
MAPTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MAPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MEGMX
MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAPTXMEGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.32

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

7.13

-0.15

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the MEGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPTX and MEGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPTX drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than MEGMX's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPTX and MEGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPTXMEGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-37.64%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-16.26%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.23%

-18.39%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.28%

-34.81%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.89%

-12.58%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-14.40%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

5.23%

-0.05%

Volatility

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) have volatilities of 10.17% and 9.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAPTXMEGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

9.88%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.53%

23.68%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.40%

25.41%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

18.91%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

18.73%

+0.16%

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MEGMX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAPTX vs. MEGMX - Dividend Comparison

MAPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than MEGMX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
1.95%2.33%8.93%2.93%8.52%4.85%5.74%3.44%4.78%1.25%2.61%11.18%
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.44%2.97%0.92%1.82%1.81%7.76%2.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MAPTX and MEGMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAPTX has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to MEGMX (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPTX dropped -69.79% vs MEGMX's -37.64%.

MEGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAPTX and MEGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer