PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAPP vs. KEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAPP vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAPP vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
-0.04%18.67%7.12%
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
12.12%22.76%2.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPP achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than KEAT's 12.12% return.


MAPP

1D
1.46%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
2.72%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KEAT

1D
1.21%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
12.12%
6M
16.70%
1Y
29.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAPP vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPP has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MAPP vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPP
MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

KEAT
KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPP vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAPPKEATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

2.49

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

3.22

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

4.05

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.36

17.08

-7.71

MAPP vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPP and KEAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAPPKEATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.49

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

1.81

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between MAPP and KEAT is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MAPP vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than KEAT's 2.37% yield.


TTM202520242023
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
2.96%2.96%2.41%2.78%
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
2.37%2.48%1.72%0.00%

Drawdowns

MAPP vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPP drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPP and KEAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPPKEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-7.45%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-7.38%

-2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-3.27%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-1.38%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.77%

+0.10%

Volatility

MAPP vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAPPKEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.76%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

8.66%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

12.05%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.83%

10.40%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

10.40%

+0.43%