MANI vs. RJVI
MANI (Man Active Income ETF) and RJVI (RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MANI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RJVI.
Performance
MANI vs. RJVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than RJVI's 1.83% return.
MANI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RJVI
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI vs. RJVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.20% | 2.10% |
RJVI RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF | 1.83% | 0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANI and RJVI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANI vs. RJVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANI vs. RJVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum RJVI drawdown of -3.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and RJVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANI | RJVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -3.12% | +2.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.33% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -1.03% | +0.92% |
Volatility
MANI vs. RJVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANI | RJVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 4.17% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 4.17% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 4.17% | -2.14% |
MANI vs. RJVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MANI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RJVI's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
MANI vs. RJVI - Dividend Comparison
MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than RJVI's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.17% | 3.00% |
RJVI RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF | 2.61% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANI and RJVI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RJVI is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RJVI is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
MANI has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.61% for RJVI.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Carillon Tower Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MANI and 0.51% for RJVI.
Find the right allocation for MANI and RJVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer