PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANI vs. RJVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MANI vs. RJVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than RJVI's 1.83% return.


MANI

1D
0.04%
1M
0.75%
YTD
4.20%
6M
4.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RJVI

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANI vs. RJVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
4.20%2.10%
RJVI
RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
1.83%0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MANI and RJVI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANI vs. RJVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MANI vs. RJVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MANI vs. RJVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum RJVI drawdown of -3.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and RJVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANIRJVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-3.12%

+2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.33%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-1.03%

+0.92%

Volatility

MANI vs. RJVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANIRJVIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

4.17%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.03%

4.17%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.03%

4.17%

-2.14%

MANI vs. RJVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MANI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RJVI's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MANI vs. RJVI - Dividend Comparison

MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than RJVI's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.17%3.00%
RJVI
RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
2.61%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MANI and RJVI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RJVI is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RJVI is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.

MANI has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.61% for RJVI.

They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Carillon Tower Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MANI and 0.51% for RJVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANI and RJVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer