MANI vs. MUSI
MANI (Man Active Income ETF) and MUSI (American Century Multisector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MANI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MUSI.
Performance
MANI vs. MUSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than MUSI's 0.32% return.
MANI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUSI
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI vs. MUSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.71% | 2.34% |
MUSI American Century Multisector Income ETF | 0.32% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANI and MUSI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANI vs. MUSI — Risk / Return Rank
MANI
MUSI
MANI vs. MUSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MANI | MUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.24 | 0.44 | +3.81 |
Drawdowns
MANI vs. MUSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum MUSI drawdown of -13.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and MUSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANI | MUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -13.91% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -1.41% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -4.22% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility
MANI vs. MUSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANI | MUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 3.34% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 4.85% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 4.85% | -2.78% |
MANI vs. MUSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MANI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MUSI's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
MANI vs. MUSI - Dividend Comparison
MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than MUSI's 5.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.18% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUSI American Century Multisector Income ETF | 5.56% | 5.74% | 6.00% | 5.20% | 4.02% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANI and MUSI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUSI is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUSI is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
MUSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 3.18% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MANI and 0.36% for MUSI.
Find the right allocation for MANI and MUSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer