PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANH vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MANH vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANH achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 144.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MANH having a 12.74% annualized return and INTC not far behind at 12.49%.


MANH

1D
0.20%
1M
30.70%
6M
26.72%
YTD
10.41%
1Y
-12.88%
3Y*
-0.04%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
12.74%
ALL TIME*
12.71%

INTC

1D
-1.02%
1M
-28.99%
6M
94.10%
YTD
144.44%
1Y
355.56%
3Y*
36.99%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
12.49%
ALL TIME*
14.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.93B$11.73B$14.62B
$192.14M$150.10M$107.01M

MANH vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
10.41%-35.87%25.51%77.36%-21.92%47.83%31.89%88.22%-14.47%-6.58%
INTC
Intel Corporation
144.44%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MANH and INTC is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 1998

0.37

The correlation between MANH and INTC shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MANH:

$11.32B

INTC:

$454.97B

EPS

MANH:

$3.49

INTC:

-$2.31

PS Ratio

MANH:

10.24

INTC:

7.74

PB Ratio

MANH:

72.31

INTC:

5.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

MANH:

$1.13B

INTC:

$57.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MANH:

$301.44M

INTC:

$22.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

MANH:

$290.03M

INTC:

$12.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANH vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MANH
MANH Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANH Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANH Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MANH vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MANHINTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.51

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

8.55

-8.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

27.80

-28.27

MANH vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANH Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANH and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MANH vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANH drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, which is greater than INTC's maximum drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANH and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANHINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.04%

-82.25%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.10%

-41.90%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.98%

-63.80%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.98%

-65.04%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.98%

-70.80%

+9.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.23%

-36.00%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-36.61%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.44%

12.87%

+14.57%

Volatility

MANH vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Intel Corporation (INTC) have volatilities of 24.18% and 23.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANHINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.18%

23.88%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.82%

59.36%

-18.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.73%

78.77%

-32.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.92%

54.05%

-14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.28%

45.24%

-4.96%

Dividends

MANH vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MANH nor INTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MANH vs. INTC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MANH vs. INTC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Intel Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MANH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of -155.57M and revenue of 297.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -52.2%.

INTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.51B and revenue of 16.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.

MANH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.23M and revenue of 297.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

INTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of 1.80B and revenue of 16.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

MANH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 50.35M and revenue of 297.79M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.

INTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -11.03B and revenue of 16.13B, resulting in a net margin of -68.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MANH and INTC have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MANH has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to INTC (23.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANH dropped -87.04% vs INTC's -82.25%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANH and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer