MANA vs. GFOF
MANA (Grayscale Decentraland Trust) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MANA is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. MANA is actively managed, while GFOF is passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MANA vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MANA
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -38.60%
- YTD
- -53.27%
- 6M
- -54.66%
- 1Y
- -75.75%
- 3Y*
- -56.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANA vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust | -53.27% | -91.36% | -28.08% | 756.41% | -83.75% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.08% | 145.49% | -45.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANA and GFOF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANA vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank
MANA
GFOF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MANA vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MANA | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANA vs. GFOF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANA | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.20% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.69% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.43% | — | — |
Volatility
MANA vs. GFOF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANA | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.59% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.61% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.61% | — | — |
Dividends
MANA vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison
Neither MANA nor GFOF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANA and GFOF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANA and GFOF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MANA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain.
Find the right allocation for MANA and GFOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer