MANA vs. BTRN
MANA (Grayscale Decentraland Trust) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. MANA is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, MANA returned -75.75% vs -18.78% for BTRN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MANA vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANA achieves a -53.27% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -10.63% return.
MANA
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -38.60%
- YTD
- -53.27%
- 6M
- -54.66%
- 1Y
- -75.75%
- 3Y*
- -56.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.63%
- 1Y
- -18.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANA vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust | -53.27% | -91.36% | -63.61% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -10.63% | 4.89% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANA and BTRN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANA vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
MANA
BTRN
MANA vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MANA | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.81 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.71 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.17 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANA vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANA drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANA and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANA | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -36.97% | -62.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.85% | -26.45% | -59.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.20% | -26.40% | -72.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.69% | -14.72% | -56.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.43% | 16.08% | +40.35% |
Volatility
MANA vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) has a higher volatility of 37.05% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 3.65%. This indicates that MANA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANA | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.05% | 3.65% | +33.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.80% | 10.21% | +79.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.59% | 18.50% | +99.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.61% | 30.51% | +144.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.61% | 30.51% | +144.10% |
Dividends
MANA vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
MANA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 31.41% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANA and BTRN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANA has higher volatility (37.05%) compared to BTRN (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANA dropped -99.28% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -18.78% vs -75.75% for MANA. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -18.78% return vs -75.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.41%, compared with 0.00% for MANA.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Global X.
MANA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MANA and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer