MAMA vs. JNJ
MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. MAMA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, MAMA returned 35.78%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAMA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMA achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MAMA has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 35.78%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 87.31%
- 3Y*
- 75.68%
- 5Y*
- 38.65%
- 10Y*
- 35.78%
JNJ
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 57.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
MAMA vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 10.53% | 69.47% | 62.12% | 173.54% | -10.70% | 12.29% | 47.93% | 75.36% | -46.92% | 80.56% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.68% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMA and JNJ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014 | 0.03 |
The correlation between MAMA and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (5 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAMA:
$645.92M
JNJ:
$588.98B
MAMA:
$0.15
JNJ:
$8.65
MAMA:
101.52
JNJ:
27.85
MAMA:
3.00
JNJ:
0.93
MAMA:
3.28
JNJ:
6.08
MAMA:
11.67
JNJ:
7.25
MAMA:
$189.23M
JNJ:
$96.36B
MAMA:
$46.29M
JNJ:
$66.60B
MAMA:
$11.97M
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAMA vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
MAMA
JNJ
MAMA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAMA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.61 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 5.28 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | 15.52 | -6.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAMA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMA drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMA and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.83% | -50.67% | -39.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -10.96% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.54% | -15.95% | -26.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.85% | -18.41% | -50.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.35% | -27.37% | -51.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.21% | -2.54% | -11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -11.90% | -33.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 3.72% | +5.95% |
Volatility
MAMA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.47%. This indicates that MAMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAMA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.32% | 5.47% | +13.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.09% | 12.16% | +20.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.50% | 16.94% | +35.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.99% | 16.87% | +41.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.61% | 18.48% | +63.13% |
Dividends
MAMA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.18% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MAMA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mama's Creations Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAMA vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAMA and JNJ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMA has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMA dropped -89.83% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAMA and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer