MAKX vs. SQQQ
MAKX (ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MAKX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAKX returned 28.32%/yr vs -56.19%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions. MAKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return.
MAKX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 17.86%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 42.02%
- 1Y
- 82.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 47.39% | 21.63% | 8.27% | 26.03% | -26.41% | 3.91% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -31.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAKX and SQQQ is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.78 |
The correlation between MAKX and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAKX
SQQQ
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Industrials
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
MAKX
-
SQQQ
Healthcare
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAKX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MAKX
SQQQ
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.72 | +0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | -0.99 | +6.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | -1.82 | +17.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | -1.37 | +4.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | -0.88 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -100.00% | +59.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -65.95% | +49.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -92.38% | +62.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -100.00% | +98.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -92.40% | +75.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 35.73% | -30.47% |
Volatility
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is 10.34%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that MAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 13.75% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.93% | 36.45% | -16.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.03% | 47.79% | -18.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.18% | 66.64% | -38.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.18% | 66.11% | -37.93% |
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAKX and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to MAKX (10.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, MAKX leads with 28.32% vs -56.19% for SQQQ. On fees, MAKX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MAKX has been the lower-risk option at 10.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAKX has performed better with a 28.32% return vs -56.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAKX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.10% for MAKX.
MAKX is categorized as Technology Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. MAKX tracks S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.95% for SQQQ.
MAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAKX and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer