PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAKX vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MAKX
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
3.72%21.63%8.27%26.03%-26.41%3.91%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
18.46%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-31.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than SQQQ's 18.46% return.


MAKX

1D
4.38%
1M
-7.27%
YTD
3.72%
6M
1.36%
1Y
44.89%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
10Y*

SQQQ

1D
-9.99%
1M
14.53%
YTD
18.46%
6M
9.00%
1Y
-55.48%
3Y*
-48.73%
5Y*
-42.26%
10Y*
-52.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAKX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MAKX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAKX
MAKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAKXSQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

-0.83

+2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

-1.11

+3.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.85

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

-0.74

+3.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.61

-0.85

+8.46

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAKX and SQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAKXSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

-0.83

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.84

+1.07

Correlation

The correlation between MAKX and SQQQ is -0.79. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SQQQ's 5.77% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAKX
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
0.14%0.15%0.24%0.52%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
5.77%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Drawdowns

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and SQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAKXSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-100.00%

+59.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

-75.23%

+59.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.78%

-100.00%

+90.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-92.32%

+75.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

65.25%

-59.54%

Volatility

MAKX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is 10.24%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.67%. This indicates that MAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAKXSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.24%

19.67%

-9.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

38.04%

-16.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.34%

67.28%

-34.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.03%

66.67%

-38.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.03%

65.97%

-37.94%