MAKX vs. SQQQ
MAKX (ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MAKX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAKX returned 20.16%/yr vs -49.83%/yr for SQQQ. Their -0.79 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MAKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 30.73% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -34.61% return.
MAKX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 21.32%
- YTD
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 39.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- 6M
- -32.40%
- YTD
- -34.61%
- 1Y
- -52.32%
- 3Y*
- -49.83%
- 5Y*
- -44.46%
- 10Y*
- -54.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $87.07K | $94.68K | $155.23K | |
| $2.40B | $2.29B | $2.66B |
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 30.73% | 21.63% | 8.27% | 26.03% | -26.41% | 3.10% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -34.61% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -30.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAKX and SQQQ is -0.77, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | -0.79 |
The correlation between MAKX and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAKX
SQQQ
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Industrials
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
MAKX
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
MAKX
-
SQQQ
Healthcare
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
MAKX
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAKX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MAKX
SQQQ
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.81 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | -1.41 | +6.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -100.00% | +59.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -61.03% | +41.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -92.51% | +62.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.67% | -100.00% | +87.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.34% | -92.78% | +76.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 35.08% | -28.54% |
Volatility
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is 13.58%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 20.82%. This indicates that MAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAKX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | 20.82% | -7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.57% | 48.09% | -21.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.62% | 57.98% | -24.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 68.18% | -39.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 66.74% | -37.68% |
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAKX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SQQQ's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.14% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAKX and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (20.82%) compared to MAKX (13.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, MAKX leads with 20.16% vs -49.83% for SQQQ. On fees, MAKX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MAKX has been the lower-risk option at 13.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAKX has performed better with a 20.16% return vs -49.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAKX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.14%, compared with 0.14% for MAKX.
MAKX is categorized as Technology Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. MAKX tracks S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.95% for SQQQ.
MAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAKX and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer