PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAIN vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAIN vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Unilever PLC (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAIN achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than UL's -3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MAIN has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 13.39%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


MAIN

1D
-1.41%
1M
8.28%
6M
-11.20%
YTD
-5.54%
1Y
-8.71%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
13.39%
ALL TIME*
16.56%

UL

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.16%
6M
-2.23%
YTD
-3.56%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
5.17%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAIN vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
-5.54%10.74%47.30%28.22%-11.37%48.31%-19.54%36.88%-8.27%16.62%
UL
Unilever PLC
-3.56%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MAIN and UL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAIN:

$5.08B

UL:

$133.56B

EPS

MAIN:

$5.21

UL:

€5.38

PE Ratio

MAIN:

10.48

UL:

10.07

PEG Ratio

MAIN:

1.19

UL:

1.97

PS Ratio

MAIN:

6.97

UL:

1.09

PB Ratio

MAIN:

1.60

UL:

7.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAIN:

$704.17M

UL:

€109.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAIN:

$499.08M

UL:

€90.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAIN:

$396.90M

UL:

€24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAIN vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAIN
MAIN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAIN vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAINULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.98

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

-0.18

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

-0.35

-0.35

MAIN vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAIN and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAIN vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAIN drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIN and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAINULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.53%

-53.55%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.43%

-25.09%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-25.09%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-25.09%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

-30.13%

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.30%

-15.44%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-10.62%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.47%

13.20%

-0.73%

Volatility

MAIN vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) is 5.94%, while Unilever PLC (UL) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that MAIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAINULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

6.50%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.81%

17.27%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.32%

22.22%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

21.04%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.36%

21.52%

+5.84%

Dividends

MAIN vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

MAIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than UL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
7.88%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.68%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

MAIN vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Main Street Capital Corporation and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
140.11M
18.38B
(MAIN) Total Revenue
(UL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MAIN values in USD, UL values in EUR

MAIN vs. UL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Main Street Capital Corporation and Unilever PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober202600
Portfolio components
MAIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 140.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MAIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 140.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

MAIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported a net income of 90.82M and revenue of 140.11M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAIN and UL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UL has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to MAIN (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAIN dropped -64.53% vs UL's -53.55%.

UL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAIN and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer