MAGY vs. PBP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP).

MAGY and PBP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGY is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 23, 2025. PBP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.

Performance

MAGY vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAGY vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-9.64%	26.79%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	-1.04%	15.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's -1.04% return.

MAGY

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: -9.64%
• 6M: -7.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -1.04%
• 6M: 5.76%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 10.74%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 6.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

MAGY

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF

PBP

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

Return for Risk

MAGY vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 56
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGY	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.32	+0.73

Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and PBP is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MAGY vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, more than PBP's 11.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	37.14%	23.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.63%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGY	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-43.43%	+29.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.60%	-3.29%	-8.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-6.75%	+4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MAGY	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	14.26%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.87%	11.95%	+2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.87%	13.69%	+1.18%