MAGY vs. IPDP
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
MAGY vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 2.04% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
MAGY vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGY
IPDP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MAGY
IPDP
Basic Materials
MAGY
-
IPDP
Communication Services
MAGY
-
IPDP
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAGY
-
IPDP
Consumer Defensive
MAGY
-
IPDP
Energy
MAGY
-
IPDP
-
Healthcare
MAGY
-
IPDP
Industrials
MAGY
-
IPDP
Real Estate
MAGY
-
IPDP
-
Technology
MAGY
-
IPDP
Utilities
MAGY
-
IPDP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
IPDP
MAGY vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGY | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGY | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | 0.00% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | 0.00% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | 0.00% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | — | — |
Volatility
MAGY vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 0.00% | +14.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 0.00% | +14.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 0.00% | +14.57% |
MAGY vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGY vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 37.35% | 23.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MAGY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer