MAGY vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 3.73% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

MAGY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -7.53% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

MAGY

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -7.24%
• YTD: -7.53%
• 6M: -8.15%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-7.53%	26.42%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and BAMU is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

MAGY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGY

MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 11
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	4.94	-4.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	8.71	-8.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	2.41	-1.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	24.37	-24.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	96.52	-95.71

MAGY vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGY and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGY	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-0.36%	-13.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.29%	-0.12%	-14.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.54%	0.00%	-9.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-0.02%	-2.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	0.03%	+4.57%

Volatility

MAGY vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that MAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGY	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	0.09%	+6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.65%	0.39%	+12.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	0.58%	+14.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	0.87%	+14.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.45%	0.87%	+14.58%

MAGY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.01%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	40.01%	23.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGY and BAMU in my portfolio?

MAGY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGY or BAMU?

MAGY has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, MAGY or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, MAGY leads with 3.73% vs 2.87% for BAMU. On fees, MAGY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGY or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, MAGY has performed better with a 3.73% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGY or BAMU?

MAGY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGY or BAMU?

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 40.01%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between MAGY and BAMU?

MAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.