MAGX vs. YBTC
MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 50.73% vs -35.71% for YBTC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
MAGX vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -23.39% return.
MAGX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -16.32%
- YTD
- -23.39%
- 6M
- -26.70%
- 1Y
- -35.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGX vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 26.16% | 81.14% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.39% | -4.23% | 31.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGX and YBTC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGX vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
MAGX
YBTC
MAGX vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGX | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.85 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | -0.76 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -1.39 | +5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGX | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | -0.91 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.16 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
MAGX vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGX | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.19% | -47.09% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.24% | -47.09% | +9.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -44.06% | +36.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -12.89% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.09% | 25.69% | -13.60% |
Volatility
MAGX vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) have volatilities of 9.19% and 8.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGX | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 8.85% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 31.81% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 39.20% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 40.81% | +12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 40.81% | +12.71% |
MAGX vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MAGX and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
MAGX vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than YBTC's 88.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.02% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 88.13% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGX and YBTC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGX has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs YBTC's -47.09%.
On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs -35.71% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs -35.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.
MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency.
MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGX and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer