PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. XPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than XPAY's 10.82% return.


MAGX

1D
4.45%
1M
5.74%
6M
5.99%
YTD
2.02%
1Y
35.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XPAY

1D
0.15%
1M
0.14%
6M
9.36%
YTD
10.82%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and XPAY is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.81

The correlation between MAGX and XPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGX vs. XPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGX
XPAY

Financial Services

37.2%
11.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.0%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

MAGX
37.2%
XPAY
11.1%

Basic Materials

MAGX

-

XPAY
1.7%

Communication Services

MAGX

-

XPAY
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGX

-

XPAY
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

MAGX

-

XPAY
4.5%

Energy

MAGX

-

XPAY
3.1%

Healthcare

MAGX

-

XPAY
8.3%

Industrials

MAGX

-

XPAY
7.8%

Real Estate

MAGX

-

XPAY
1.8%

Technology

MAGX

-

XPAY
39.0%

Utilities

MAGX

-

XPAY
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGXXPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.32

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

10.07

-7.38

MAGX vs. XPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the XPAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and XPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and XPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXXPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-18.20%

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-9.34%

-27.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-0.69%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-2.35%

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.25%

2.15%

+11.10%

Volatility

MAGX vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 16.07% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) at 3.78%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXXPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.07%

3.78%

+12.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.53%

9.81%

+23.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.70%

12.40%

+30.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.65%

16.63%

+37.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.65%

16.63%

+37.02%

MAGX vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than XPAY's 20.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGX and XPAY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGX has higher volatility (16.07%) compared to XPAY (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs XPAY's -18.20%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 35.54% vs 21.54% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 21.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 20.87%, compared with 2.01% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XPAY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and XPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer