PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. XPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than XPAY's 10.83% return.


MAGX

1D
-2.59%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XPAY

1D
-0.68%
1M
5.07%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.69%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and XPAY is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.81

The correlation between MAGX and XPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGXXPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.93

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

13.50

-9.29

MAGX vs. XPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the XPAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and XPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGXXPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.31

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.21

-0.36

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and XPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXXPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-18.20%

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-9.34%

-27.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-0.68%

-6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-2.37%

-11.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

2.02%

+10.07%

Volatility

MAGX vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) at 2.76%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXXPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

2.76%

+6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

8.82%

+19.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.88%

11.82%

+28.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.52%

16.70%

+36.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.52%

16.70%

+36.82%

MAGX vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than XPAY's 20.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGX and XPAY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGX has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to XPAY (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs XPAY's -18.20%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs 27.22% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 20.37%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XPAY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and XPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer