PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's -3.87% return.


MAGX

1D
0.95%
1M
9.92%
6M
4.52%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
41.16%

QQQD

1D
-0.68%
1M
-5.70%
6M
-5.44%
YTD
-3.87%
1Y
-15.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.93M$4.39M$4.75M
$1.26M$1.22M$1.70M

MAGX vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
0.37%26.16%85.10%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
-3.87%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and QQQD is -0.98, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

-0.98

The correlation between MAGX and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGX vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGXQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.90

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

-0.73

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

-1.26

+3.29

MAGX vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-49.47%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-21.94%

-15.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.51%

-48.02%

+39.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-31.32%

+17.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.85%

12.64%

+1.21%

Volatility

MAGX vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 8.67%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.19%

8.67%

+8.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.81%

17.96%

+17.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.80%

22.50%

+22.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.95%

27.00%

+26.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.95%

27.00%

+26.95%

MAGX vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than QQQD's 3.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGX and QQQD have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGX has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to QQQD (8.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 28.07% vs -15.94% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 8.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 28.07% return vs -15.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.04% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.57% for QQQD.

MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer