PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's -2.89% return.


MAGX

1D
-2.59%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQD

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
-21.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
1.49%26.16%75.36%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
-2.89%-20.32%-27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and QQQD is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

-0.98

The correlation between MAGX and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGXQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.83

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.82

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

-1.23

+5.44

MAGX vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGXQQQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

-1.08

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.86

+1.71

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-49.47%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-26.65%

-10.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-47.50%

+40.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-30.34%

+16.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

17.72%

-5.63%

Volatility

MAGX vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 4.76%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

4.76%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

14.43%

+14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.88%

20.21%

+19.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.52%

26.77%

+26.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.52%

26.77%

+26.75%

MAGX vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than QQQD's 4.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGX and QQQD have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGX has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to QQQD (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs -21.80% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs -21.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.57% for QQQD.

MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer