PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a -13.73% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's 4.24% return.


MAGX

1D
-2.86%
1M
-17.70%
YTD
-13.73%
6M
-16.51%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQD

1D
0.67%
1M
9.00%
YTD
4.24%
6M
6.32%
1Y
-14.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-13.73%26.16%85.10%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
4.24%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and QQQD is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

-0.98

The correlation between MAGX and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGXQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.90

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.64

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

-1.01

+3.04

MAGX vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-49.47%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-22.92%

-14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.36%

-43.64%

+22.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-30.63%

+16.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.59%

14.98%

-2.39%

Volatility

MAGX vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 15.32% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.17%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.32%

7.17%

+8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.75%

15.65%

+16.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.71%

20.89%

+20.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.76%

26.85%

+26.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.76%

26.85%

+26.91%

MAGX vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than QQQD's 3.79% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGX and QQQD have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGX has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to QQQD (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 25.45% vs -14.61% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 25.45% return vs -14.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 2.37% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.57% for QQQD.

MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer