MAGX vs. NVDX
MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 50.73% vs 75.17% for NVDX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDX.
Performance
MAGX vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 17.35% return.
MAGX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDX
- 1D
- -7.03%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 75.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGX vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 26.16% | 81.14% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 17.35% | 26.24% | 100.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGX and NVDX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between MAGX and NVDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGX vs. NVDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGX
NVDX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MAGX
NVDX
-
Basic Materials
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Communication Services
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Consumer Defensive
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Energy
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Healthcare
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Industrials
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Real Estate
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Technology
MAGX
-
NVDX
Utilities
MAGX
-
NVDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGX vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank
MAGX
NVDX
MAGX vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGX | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.73 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 3.91 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGX | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.11 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.44 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
MAGX vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and NVDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGX | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.19% | -68.19% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.24% | -43.76% | +6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -18.27% | +10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -20.28% | +6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.09% | 19.27% | -7.18% |
Volatility
MAGX vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) is 9.19%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that MAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGX | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 24.68% | -15.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 50.88% | -22.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 68.45% | -28.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 95.58% | -42.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 95.58% | -42.06% |
MAGX vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGX vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison
MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than NVDX's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.02% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 2.85% | 3.35% | 15.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGX and NVDX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDX has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to MAGX (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs NVDX's -68.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 75.17% vs 50.73% for MAGX. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 75.17% return vs 50.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.
NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 1.05% for NVDX.
MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGX and NVDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer